Environmental / Resource Management

Question Of Riverbed Ownership Adjoining Maori Land Left Open

Created: Wednesday, 26 November 2014 16:46

In the final of a series of cases, the Supreme Court in Paki & Ors v Attorney General [2014] NZSC 118dismissed a claim by the appellants that they had title to part of the riverbed of the Waikato River adjoining their lands; leaving the question of riverbed ownership open. The appellants are descendants of members of various hapu that were awarded interests in land subdivided from the Pouakani block by the Native Land Court (NLC) in the late 19th century. The Courts have released this decision as being one of public interest, and a copy is available Public Sector, Environment & Resources.

It's here so let's get to know it: The Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Act 2013

Created: Wednesday, 13 August 2014 03:55

The Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 3) (the Bill) passed its final reading in Parliament on 30 July 2014 and received the Royal assent on 7 August 2014. We have previously given an overview of the Bill, which amends the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act), and was referred to the Local Government and Environment Select Committee (Select Committee) on 3 December 2013. We also commented in more detail on provisions in the Bill relating to development contributions and local boards. You can view a copy of the Select Committee's Report from 12 May 2014 here.

Supreme Court Affirms Environmental Bottom Line

Created: Friday, 06 June 2014 04:25

SUPREME COURT AFFIRMS ENVIRONMENTAL BOTTOM LINE APPROACH WHERE POLICIES ARE DIRECTIVE

In Environmental Defence Society Incorporated v The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited and Ors [2014] NZSC 38, the Supreme Court expressed its views on the interpretation of the New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement ("the NZCPS") with regard to the management framework within the Resource Management Act ("the RMA").

Many Tortfeasors Make Light Work Of Compensation

Created: Friday, 06 June 2014 04:22

VIECELI V CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL [2014] NZHC 748

This case concerns the approach to apportionment of liability between district councils and developers for the cost of repairs of defects in the construction of buildings.

The developer, Gilgamesh Limited, owed a non-delegable duty of care pursuant to its contract with a purchaser of a property to ensure that the property was constructed in accordance with the building consent, the Building Act 1991 (as it was at that time) and in a proper and workmanlike manner. The Christchurch City Council successfully argued that the developer had breached this duty of care and was therefore liable to the Council as a joint tortfeasor for a contribution to the settlement paid by the Council.

Winter is coming

Created: Wednesday, 07 May 2014 04:32

Winter is coming and change is a-foot: legislation updates

With the introduction of the Statutes Amendment Bill (No.4) (Bill) the Government has responded to a need to modernise, clarify and correct a suite of statues of direct relevance to local government. However, the Bill also includes a number of substantive amendments which, if retained, will have an effect on the procedures and processes of local authorities. These are summarised below.

New Reg's Test Council Performance

Created: Friday, 11 April 2014 04:39

NEW REG'S TEST COUNCIL PERFORMANCE

Local Government (Financial Reporting and Prudence) Regulations 2014

The financial performance of the local government sector is under closer scrutiny with the advent of the Local Government (Financial Reporting and Prudence) Regulations 2014 (Regulations). They arose from amendments made to the Local Government Act 2002 as part of Government's Better Local Government Policy.

Page 9 of 17